Paper detail

A new correlation clustering method for cancer mutation analysis

Cancer genomes exhibit a large number of different alterations that affect many genes in a diverse manner. It is widely believed that these alterations follow combinatorial patterns that have a strong connection with the underlying molecular interaction networks and functional pathways. A better understanding of the generative mechanisms behind the mutation rules and their influence on gene communities is of great importance for the process of driver mutations discovery and for identification of network modules related to cancer development and progression. We developed a new method for cancer mutation pattern analysis based on a constrained form of correlation clustering. Correlation clustering is an agnostic learning method that can be used for general community detection problems in which the number of communities or their structure is not known beforehand. The resulting algorithm, named $C^3$, leverages mutual exclusivity of mutations, patient coverage, and driver network concentration principles; it accepts as its input a user determined combination of heterogeneous patient data, such as that available from TCGA (including mutation, copy number, and gene expression information), and creates a large number of clusters containing mutually exclusive mutated genes in a particular type of cancer. The cluster sizes may be required to obey some useful soft size constraints, without impacting the computational complexity of the algorithm. To test $C^3$, we performed a detailed analysis on TCGA breast cancer and glioblastoma data and showed that our algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art CoMEt method in terms of discovering mutually exclusive gene modules and identifying driver genes. Our $C^3$ method represents a unique tool for efficient and reliable identification of mutation patterns and driver pathways in large-scale cancer genomics studies.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.