Paper detail

A Multiresolution Analysis Framework for the Statistical Analysis of Incomplete Rankings

Though the statistical analysis of ranking data has been a subject of interest over the past centuries, especially in economics, psychology or social choice theory, it has been revitalized in the past 15 years by recent applications such as recommender or search engines and is receiving now increasing interest in the machine learning literature. Numerous modern systems indeed generate ranking data, representing for instance ordered results to a query or user preferences. Each such ranking usually involves a small but varying subset of the whole catalog of items only. The study of the variability of these data, i.e. the statistical analysis of incomplete rank-ings, is however a great statistical and computational challenge, because of their heterogeneity and the related combinatorial complexity of the problem. Whereas many statistical methods for analyzing full rankings (orderings of all the items in the catalog) are documented in the dedicated literature, partial rankings (full rankings with ties) or pairwise comparisons, only a few approaches are available today to deal with incomplete ranking, relying each on a strong specific assumption. It is the purpose of this article to introduce a novel general framework for the statistical analysis of incomplete rankings. It is based on a representation tailored to these specific data, whose construction is also explained here, which fits with the natural multi-scale structure of incomplete rankings and provides a new decomposition of rank information with a multiresolu-tion analysis interpretation (MRA). We show that the MRA representation naturally allows to overcome both the statistical and computational challenges without any structural assumption on the data. It therefore provides a general and flexible framework to solve a wide variety of statistical problems, where data are of the form of incomplete rankings.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.