Paper detail

A Multiple Hypothesis Testing Approach to Low-Complexity Subspace Unmixing

Subspace-based signal processing traditionally focuses on problems involving a few subspaces. Recently, a number of problems in different application areas have emerged that involve a significantly larger number of subspaces relative to the ambient dimension. It becomes imperative in such settings to first identify a smaller set of active subspaces that contribute to the observation before further processing can be carried out. This problem of identification of a small set of active subspaces among a huge collection of subspaces from a single (noisy) observation in the ambient space is termed subspace unmixing. This paper formally poses the subspace unmixing problem under the parsimonious subspace-sum (PS3) model, discusses connections of the PS3 model to problems in wireless communications, hyperspectral imaging, high-dimensional statistics and compressed sensing, and proposes a low-complexity algorithm, termed marginal subspace detection (MSD), for subspace unmixing. The MSD algorithm turns the subspace unmixing problem for the PS3 model into a multiple hypothesis testing (MHT) problem and its analysis in the paper helps control the family-wise error rate of this MHT problem at any level $α\in [0,1]$ under two random signal generation models. Some other highlights of the analysis of the MSD algorithm include: (i) it is applicable to an arbitrary collection of subspaces on the Grassmann manifold; (ii) it relies on properties of the collection of subspaces that are computable in polynomial time; and ($iii$) it allows for linear scaling of the number of active subspaces as a function of the ambient dimension. Finally, numerical results are presented in the paper to better understand the performance of the MSD algorithm.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.