Paper detail

A Modern Theory for High-dimensional Cox Regression Models

The proportional hazards model has been extensively used in many fields such as biomedicine to estimate and perform statistical significance testing on the effects of covariates influencing the survival time of patients. The classical theory of maximum partial-likelihood estimation (MPLE) is used by most software packages to produce inference, e.g., the coxph function in R and the PHREG procedure in SAS. In this paper, we investigate the asymptotic behavior of the MPLE in the regime in which the number of parameters p is of the same order as the number of samples n. The main results are (i) existence of the MPLE undergoes a sharp 'phase transition'; (ii) the classical MPLE theory leads to invalid inference in the high-dimensional regime. We show that the asymptotic behavior of the MPLE is governed by a new asymptotic theory. These findings are further corroborated through numerical studies. The main technical tool in our proofs is the Convex Gaussian Min-max Theorem (CGMT), which has not been previously used in the analysis of partial likelihood. Our results thus extend the scope of CGMT and shed new light on the use of CGMT for examining the existence of MPLE and non-separable objective functions.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.