Paper detail

A Model of Double Descent for High-dimensional Binary Linear Classification

We consider a model for logistic regression where only a subset of features of size $p$ is used for training a linear classifier over $n$ training samples. The classifier is obtained by running gradient descent (GD) on logistic loss. For this model, we investigate the dependence of the classification error on the overparameterization ratio $κ=p/n$. First, building on known deterministic results on the implicit bias of GD, we uncover a phase-transition phenomenon for the case of Gaussian features: the classification error of GD is the same as that of the maximum-likelihood (ML) solution when $κ<κ_\star$, and that of the max-margin (SVM) solution when $κ>κ_\star$. Next, using the convex Gaussian min-max theorem (CGMT), we sharply characterize the performance of both the ML and the SVM solutions. Combining these results, we obtain curves that explicitly characterize the classification error for varying values of $κ$. The numerical results validate the theoretical predictions and unveil double-descent phenomena that complement similar recent findings in linear regression settings as well as empirical observations in more complex learning scenarios.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.