Paper detail

A Model for Adversarial Wiretap Channel

In wiretap model of secure communication the goal is to provide (asymptotic) perfect secrecy and reliable communication over a noisy channel that is eavesdropped by an adversary with unlimited computational power. This goal is achieved by taking advantage of the channel noise and without requiring a shared key. The model has attracted attention in recent years because it captures eavesdropping attack in wireless communication. The wiretap adversary is a passive eavesdropping adversary at the physical layer of communication. In this paper we propose a model for adversarial wiretap (AWTP) channel that models active adversaries at this layer. We consider a $(ρ_r, ρ_w)$ wiretap adversary who can see a fraction $ρ_r$, and modify a fraction $ρ_w$, of the sent codeword. The code components that are read and/or modified can be chosen adaptively, and the subsets of read and modified components in general, can be different. AWTP codes provide secrecy and reliability for communication over these channels. We give security and reliability definitions and measures for these codes, and define secrecy capacity of an AWTP channel that represents the secrecy potential of the channel. The paper has two main contributions. First, we prove a tight upper bound on the rate of AWTP codes with perfect secrecy for $(ρ_r, ρ_w)$-AWTP channels, and use the bound to derive the secrecy capacity of the channel. We prove a similar bound for $ε$-secure codes also, but in this case the bound is not tight. Second, we give an explicit construction for a capacity achieving AWTP code family, and prove its security and efficiency properties. We show that AWTP model is a natural generalization of Wyner's wiretap models and somewhat surprisingly, also provides a direct generalization for a seemingly unrelated cryptographic primitive, Secure Message Transmission (SMT).

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.