Paper detail

A microscopically accurate model of partially ballistic nanoMOSFETs in saturation based on channel backscattering

We propose a model for partially ballistic MOSFETs and for channel backscattering that is alternative to the well known Lundstrom model and is more accurate from the point of view of the actual energy distribution of carriers. The key point is that we do not use the concept of "virtual source". Our model differs from the Lundstrom model in two assumptions: i) the reflection coefficients from the top of the energy barrier to the drain and from top of the barrier to the source are approximately equal (whereas in the Lundstrom model the latter is zero), and ii) inelastic scattering is assumed through a ratio of the average velocity of forward-going carriers to that of backward-going carriers at the top of the barrier kv > 1 (=1 in the Lundstrom model). We support our assumptions with 2D full band Monte Carlo (MC) simulations including quantum corrections in nMOSFETs. We show that our model allows to extract from the electrical characteristics a backscattering coefficient very close to that obtained from the solution of the Boltzmann transport equation, whereas the Lundstrom model overestimates backscattering by up to 40%.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.