Paper detail

A Method to Support Difficult Re-finding Tasks

Re-finding electronic documents from a personal computer is a frequent demand to users. In a simple re-finding task, people can use many methods to retrieve a document, such as navigating directly to the document's folder, searching with a desktop search engine, or checking the Recent Files List. However, when encountering a difficult re-finding task, people usually cannot remember the attributes used by conventional re-finding methods, such as file path, file name, keywords etc., the re-finding would fail. We propose a new method to support difficult re-finding tasks. When a user is reading a document, we collect all kinds of possible memory pieces of the user about the document, such as number of pages, number of images, number of math formulas, cumulative reading time, reading frequency, printing experiences etc. If the user wants to re-find a document later, we use these collected attributes to filter out the target document. To alleviate the user's cognitive burden, we use a question and answer wizard interface and provide recommendations to the answers for the user, the recommendations are generated by analyzing the collected attributes of each document and the user's experiences about them.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.