Paper detail

A Machine Learning Approach for Material Type Logging and Chemical Assaying from Autonomous Measure-While-Drilling (MWD) Data

Understanding the structure and mineralogical composition of a region is an essential step in mining, both during exploration (before mining) and in the mining process. During exploration, sparse but high-quality data are gathered to assess the overall orebody. During the mining process, boundary positions and material properties are refined as the mine progresses. This refinement is facilitated through drilling, material logging, and chemical assaying. Material type logging suffers from a high degree of variability due to factors such as the diversity in mineralization and geology, the subjective nature of human measurement even by experts, and human error in manually recording results. While laboratory-based chemical assaying is much more precise, it is time-consuming and costly and does not always capture or correlate boundary positions between all material types. This leads to significant challenges and financial implications for the industry, as the accuracy of production blasthole logging and assaying processes is essential for resource evaluation, planning, and execution of mine plans. To overcome these challenges, this work reports on a pilot study to automate the process of material logging and chemical assaying. A machine learning approach has been trained on features extracted from measurement-while-drilling (MWD) data, logged from autonomous drilling systems (ADS). MWD data facilitate the construction of profiles of physical drilling parameters as a function of hole depth. A hypothesis is formed to link these drilling parameters to the underlying mineral composition. The results of the pilot study discussed in this paper demonstrate the feasibility of this process, with correlation coefficients of up to 0.92 for chemical assays and 93% accuracy for material detection, depending on the material or assay type and their generalization across the different spatial regions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.