Paper detail

A Linear Model for Interval-valued Data

Interval-valued linear regression has been investigated for some time. One of the critical issues is optimizing the balance between model flexibility and interpretability. This paper proposes a linear model for interval-valued data based on the affine operators in the cone $\mathcal{C} = \{ (x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 | x \leq y\}$. The resulting new model is shown to have improved flexibility over typical models in the literature, while maintaining a good interpretability. The least squares (LS) estimators of the model parameters are provided in a simple explicit form, which possesses a series of nice properties. Further investigations into the LS estimators shed light on the positive restrictions of a subset of the parameters and their implications on the model validity. A simulation study is presented that supports the theoretical findings. An application to a real data set is also provided to demonstrate the applicability of our model.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.