Paper detail

A lateral nanoflow assay reveals nanoplastic fluorescence heterogeneity

Plastic nanoparticles present technological opportunities and environmental concerns, but measurement challenges impede product development and hazard assessment. To meet these challenges, we advance a lateral nanoflow assay that integrates complex nanofluidic replicas, optical localization microscopy, and novel statistical analyses. We apply our sample-in-answer-out system to measure polystyrene nanoparticles that sorb and carry hydrophobic fluorophores. An elegant scaling of surface forces automates advection and dominates diffusion to drive the analytical separation of colloidal nanoparticles by their steric diameters. Reference nanoparticles, with a mean of 99 nm and a standard deviation of 8.4 nm, test the unknown limits of silicone replicas to function as separation matrices. New calibrations correct aberrations from microscope and device, improving the accuracy of reducing single micrographs to joint histograms of steric diameter and fluorescence intensity. A dimensional model approaches the information limit of the system to discriminate size exclusion from surface adsorption, yielding errors of the mean ranging from 0.2 nm to 2.3 nm and errors of the standard deviation ranging from 2.2 nm to 4.2 nm. A hierarchical model accounts for metrological, optical, and dimensional variability to reveal a fundamental structure-property relationship. Intensity scales with diameter to the power of 3.6 +/- 0.5 at 95 % coverage, confounding basic concepts of surface adsorption or volume absorption. Distributions of fluorescivity - the product of the number density, absorption cross section, and quantum yield of an ensemble of fluorophores - are ultrabroad and asymmetric, limiting any inference from fluorescence intensity. This surprising characterization of common nanoplastics resets expectations for optimizing products, applying standards, and understanding byproducts.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.