Paper detail

A hint to the origin of the extended emission in LAT GRBs: the relation between LAT luminosity and prompt energetics

We consider the 0.1-10 GeV rest frame light curves of 10 GRBs detected by LAT and with known redshift. In all cases the emission persists after the prompt has faded away. This extended emission decays in time as a power-law. The decay slope is similar among different bursts, while the normalization spans more than 2 decades. However, when the LAT luminosity is normalized to the 1 keV-10 MeV energetics of the prompt emission E_iso all light curves become consistent with having the same normalization, i.e. they cluster. At each given time the ratio between the LAT luminosity and the prompt energetics is narrowly distributed. We argue that this result is expected in the external shock scenario and it strengthens the interpretation of the GeV emission in terms of radiation from external shocks. In this context, we derive limits on the distribution of epsilon_e (the fraction of the shock energy that goes into electrons) and eta (the efficiency of the mechanism producing the prompt).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.