Researcher profile

G. Vianello

G. Vianello contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A new fitting function for GRB MeV spectra based on the internal shock synchrotron model

While the Band function or other phenomenological functions are commonly used to fit GRB prompt emission spectra, we propose a new parametric function that is inspired by an internal shock physical model. We use this function as a proxy of the model to confront it easily to GRB observations. We built a parametric function that represents the spectral form of the synthetic bursts provided by our internal shock synchrotron model (ISSM). We simulated the response of the Fermi instruments to the synthetic bursts and fitted the obtained count spectra to validate the ISSM function. Then, we applied this function to a sample of 74 bright GRBs detected by the Fermi/GBM, and we computed the width of their spectral energy distributions around their peak energy. For comparison, we fitted also the phenomenological functions that are commonly used in the literature. Finally, we performed a time-resolved analysis of the broadband spectrum of GRB 090926A, which was jointly detected by the Fermi GBM and LAT. The ISSM function reproduces 81% of the spectra in the GBM bright GRB sample, versus 59% for the Band function, for the same number of parameters. It gives also relatively good fits to the GRB 090926A spectra. The width of the MeV spectral component that is obtained from the fits of the ISSM function is slightly larger than the width from the Band fits, but it is smaller when observed over a wider energy range. Moreover, all of the 74 analysed spectra are found to be significantly wider than the synthetic synchrotron spectra. We discuss possible solutions to reconcile the observations with the internal shock synchrotron model, such as an improved modeling of the shock micro-physics or more accurate spectral measurements at MeV energies.

preprint2020arXiv

A Supernova Candidate at z=0.092 in XMM-Newton Archival Data

During a search for X-ray transients in the XMM-Newton archive within the EXTraS project, we discovered a new X-ray source that is detected only during a ~5 min interval of a ~21 h-long observation performed on 2011 June 21 (EXMM 023135.0-603743, probability of a random Poissonian fluctuation: ~$1.4\times10^{-27}$). With dedicated follow-up observations, we found that its position is consistent with a star-forming galaxy (SFR = 1-2 $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$) at redshift $z=0.092\pm0.003$ ($d=435\pm15$ Mpc). At this redshift, the energy released during the transient event was $2.8\times10^{46}$ erg in the 0.3-10 keV energy band (in the source rest frame). The luminosity of the transient, together with its spectral and timing properties, make EXMM 023135.0-603743 a gripping analog to the X-ray transient associated to SN 2008D, which was discovered during a Swift/XRT observation of the nearby ($d=27$ Mpc) supernova-rich galaxy NGC 2770. We interpret the XMM-Newton event as a supernova shock break-out or an early cocoon, and show that our serendipitous discovery is compatible with the rate of core-collapse supernovae derived from optical observations and much higher than that of tidal disruption events.