Paper detail

A grid function formulation of a class of ill-posed parabolic equations

We study a nonstandard formulation of the Neumann initial value problem \begin{equation} \begin{array}{rl} u_t(x,t) = Δϕ(u(x,t)), & x \in Ω\subseteq \mathbb{R}^k, \ t \in \mathbb{R} \label{abstract}\\ u(x,0) = u_0(x), & x \in Ω. \end{array} \end{equation} with Neumann boundary conditions. The function $ϕ\in C^1(\mathbb{R})$ is assumed to be decreasing either in a bounded interval $(u^-,u^+)$, or in an unbounded interval $(u^-,+\infty)$: under this hypothesis, the aforementioned problem is ill-posed and only allows for measure-valued solutions. Moreover, such solutions are in general not unique. By using nonstandard analysis, we derive from very simple physical principles a continuous-in-time and discrete-in-space model for the ill-posed pde, and we prove that this model is well-posed. We will also prove that the solution of the nonstandard formulation is coherent with the measure-valued solutions and still retains relevant physical properties, chiefly among them an entropy condition that characterizes physically admissible solutions to the original problem. We then study the asymptotic behaviour of the nonstandard solutions. In doing so, we will give a positive answer to a conjecture by Smarrazzo on the coarsening of the solutions to the ill-posed problem under the hypothesis that $ϕ$ is decreasing in the interval $(u^-,+\infty)$.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.