Paper detail

A geostatistical analysis of multiscale metallicity variations in galaxies [II]: Predicting the metallicities of Hii and diffuse ionised gas regions via universal kriging

The metallicity of diffuse ionised gas (DIG) cannot be determined using strong emission line diagnostics, which are calibrated to calculate the metallicity of Hii regions. Because of this, resolved metallicity maps from integral field spectroscopy (IFS) data remain largely incomplete. In this paper (the second of a series), we introduce the geostatistical technique of universal kriging, which allows the complete 2D metallicity distribution of a galaxy to be reconstructed from metallicities measured at Hii regions, accounting for spatial correlations between nearby data points. We apply this method to construct high-fidelity metallicity maps of the local spiral galaxy NGC 5236 using data from the TYPHOON/PrISM survey. We find significant correlation in the metallicity of Hii regions separated by up to 0.4-1.2 kpc. Predictions constructed using this method were tested using cross-validation in Hii regions, and we show that they outperform significantly interpolation based on metallicity gradients. Furthermore, we apply kriging to predict the metallicities in regions dominated by DIG emission, considering seven additional spiral galaxies with high resolution (<100pc) metallicity maps. We compare kriging maps to DIG metallicities computed with novel ionisation corrections, and find that such corrections introduce a systematic offset of up to $\pm0.1$ dex for any individual galaxy, with a scatter of 0.02-0.07 dex for the sample. Overall we recommend universal kriging, together with a calibrated geostatistical model, as the superior method for inferring the metallicities of DIG-dominated regions in local spiral galaxies, demonstrating further the potential of applying geostatistical methods to spatially resolved galaxy observations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.