BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Benjamin Metha

Benjamin Metha contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A geostatistical analysis of multiscale metallicity variations in galaxies [II]: Predicting the metallicities of Hii and diffuse ionised gas regions via universal kriging

The metallicity of diffuse ionised gas (DIG) cannot be determined using strong emission line diagnostics, which are calibrated to calculate the metallicity of Hii regions. Because of this, resolved metallicity maps from integral field spectroscopy (IFS) data remain largely incomplete. In this paper (the second of a series), we introduce the geostatistical technique of universal kriging, which allows the complete 2D metallicity distribution of a galaxy to be reconstructed from metallicities measured at Hii regions, accounting for spatial correlations between nearby data points. We apply this method to construct high-fidelity metallicity maps of the local spiral galaxy NGC 5236 using data from the TYPHOON/PrISM survey. We find significant correlation in the metallicity of Hii regions separated by up to 0.4-1.2 kpc. Predictions constructed using this method were tested using cross-validation in Hii regions, and we show that they outperform significantly interpolation based on metallicity gradients. Furthermore, we apply kriging to predict the metallicities in regions dominated by DIG emission, considering seven additional spiral galaxies with high resolution (<100pc) metallicity maps. We compare kriging maps to DIG metallicities computed with novel ionisation corrections, and find that such corrections introduce a systematic offset of up to $\pm0.1$ dex for any individual galaxy, with a scatter of 0.02-0.07 dex for the sample. Overall we recommend universal kriging, together with a calibrated geostatistical model, as the superior method for inferring the metallicities of DIG-dominated regions in local spiral galaxies, demonstrating further the potential of applying geostatistical methods to spatially resolved galaxy observations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

SkyHopper mission science case I: Identification of high redshift Gamma-Ray Bursts through space-based near-infrared afterglow observations

Long-duration gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglow observations offer cutting-edge opportunities to characterise the star formation history of the Universe back to the epoch of reionisation, and to measure the chemical composition of interstellar and intergalactic gas through absorption spectroscopy. The main barrier to progress is the low efficiency in rapidly and confidently identifying which bursts are high redshift ($z > 5$) candidates before they fade, as this requires low-latency follow-up observations at near-infrared wavelengths (or longer) to determine a reliable photometric redshift estimate. So far this task has been performed by instruments on the ground, but sky visibility and weather constraints limit the number of GRB targets that can be observed and the speed at which follow-up is possible. In this work we develop a Monte Carlo simulation framework to investigate an alternative approach based on the use of a rapid-response near-infrared nano-satellite, capable of simultaneous imaging in four bands from $0.8$ to $1.7μ$m (a mission concept called SkyHopper). We find that such a nano-satellite is capable of detecting in the H band (1.6 $μ$m) $72.5\% \pm 3.1\%$ of GRBs concurrently observable with the Swift satellite via its UVOT instrument (and $44.1\% \pm 12.3\%$ of high redshift ($z>5$) GRBs) within 60 minutes of the GRB prompt emission. This corresponds to detecting $\sim 55$ GRB afterglows per year, of which 1-3 have $z > 5$. These rates represent a substantial contribution to the field of high-$z$ GRB science, as only 23 $z > 5$ GRBs have been collectively discovered by the entire astronomical community over the last $\sim 24$ years. Additionally, we find that launching a mini-constellation of 3 near-infrared nano-satellites would increase the detection fraction of afterglows to $\sim 83\%$ and substantially reduce the latency in the photometric redshift determination.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

One star, two stars, or both? Investigating metallicity-dependant models for Gamma-Ray Burst progenitors with the IllustrisTNG simulation

The rate of long-duration gamma ray bursts (GRBs) has been identified as a potential proxy for the star formation rate (SFR) across redshift, but the exact relationship depends on GRB progenitor models (single versus binary). The single-progenitor collapsar model accounts for the preference towards low-metallicity GRB progenitors, but is in apparent tension with some high-metallicity GRB host galaxy measurements. As a possible solution, we consider the scenario where high-metallicity GRB hosts harbour low metallicity regions in which GRB progenitors form. For this, we use the IllustrisTNG cosmological hydrodynamical simulation to investigate the internal metallicity distribution of GRB hosts, implementing in post-processing different GRB formation models. Predictions (GRB rate, host metallicities and stellar masses) are compared to the high-completeness GRB legacy surveys BAT6 and SHOALS and a sample of high-redshift GRB-DLA metallicities, allowing us to compute their relative likelihoods. When the internal metallicity distribution of galaxies is ignored, the best-fitting model requires a metallicity-independent channel, as previously proposed by Trenti, Perna & Jimenez. However, when the internal metallicity distribution is considered, a basic metallicity bias model with a cutoff at $Z_{max}=0.35Z_\odot$ is the best fitting one. Current data are insufficient to discriminate among more detailed metallicity bias models, such as weak metallicity dependence of massive binaries vs stronger metallicity bias of collapsars. An increased sample of objects, and direct measurements of host stellar masses at redshift $z>2$ would allow to further constrain the origin of long GRBs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access