Paper detail

A Geometric Analysis of Sign-Magnitude Asymmetry in a ReLU + RMSNorm Block under Ternary Quantization

Pre-norm Transformers with RMSNorm tolerate ternary {-1,0,+1} weight quantization with surprisingly small loss (Ma et al., 2024). We give a geometric explanation via sign-magnitude decomposition of weight perturbations. In a two-layer ReLU + RMSNorm model with i.i.d. Gaussian weights, sign-flips produce $π/(π-2) \approx 2.75$ times more transverse output energy than sign-preserving magnitude perturbations of equal Frobenius norm, as the flip rate $p \to 0$ (Theorem 3). The mechanism: ReLU creates a hidden-space directional asymmetry between the two perturbation types, which RMSNorm's transverse-projection Fréchet derivative selectively exposes. Sign-quantization error is itself a sign-preserving perturbation with angular alignment $\cos^2 \to 2/π$ (Theorem 4); its post-ReLU radial fraction ($0.365$) matches the pre-ReLU value $1-2/π$ within $0.4\%$, so ReLU is approximately transparent to ternary error. Multi-layer compounding of the $2.75\times$ factor is not experimentally supported; the gap to real-model sign sensitivity arises from outlier features violating delocalization. For an input dimension with amplitude $α$, a single sign-flip produces post-ReLU energy amplified by $R \approx nα^2$ relative to a delocalized entry. On TinyLlama-1.1B, at linear response ($p \leq 0.5\%$), count-matched NLL leverage stabilizes at $\sim 10\times \approx n\mathbb{E}[α^2]$, matching the per-entry theory; the all-column NLL ratio of $5.0\times$ falls within $R_{\mathrm{col}} \leq 19$ ($67\times$ PPL gap reflects metric nonlinearity). Measured outlier $α$ at layer 12 (median $0.024$, max $0.26$) confirms heavy-tailed concentration. The Bussgang constant $2/π$, RMSNorm geometry, and ReLU half-space structure together explain sign-magnitude asymmetry in pre-norm models, with $R \propto nα^2$ accounting for real-model deviations.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.