Paper detail

A General Method for Large Eddy Simulation in Different Range of Turbulent Flows

Traditional large eddy simulation is based on Kolmogrov's hypothesis, and done in the inertial range. In inertial range the LES model coefficient is scale-invariant. In many cases, such as computing in the boundary layer, the filter scale is not in the inertial range, and the model coefficient changes drastically with the filter scale, thus the assumption of scale-invariance is not proper. In this paper, we propose a general principle of constraint, and then we deduce two concrete constraints based on the existing spectrum theory and priori data. The constrained dynamic Smogorinsky model can predict energy spectrum well in different range of forced and decayed turbulence. Dynamic mixed models with one of the constraints shows more efficient than some classical models in predicting energy spectrum and SGS dissipation, and also displays a strong correlation with the real stress in different range of the turbulent flows.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.