Paper detail

A general figure of merit for thick and thin transparent conductive carbon nanotube coatings

We suggest a wavelength-dependent figure of merit for transparent conducting nanotube networks, composed of the sheet resistance and the optical density. We argue that this would be more useful than other suggestions prevailing in the literature, because it relies on more realistic assumptions regarding the optical parameters of real nanotubes: it takes into account the fact that the dc resistivity depends on the concentration of free carriers, while the visible absorption is caused by bound carriers. Based on sheet resistance measurements and wide-range transmission spectra, we compare several commercial nanotube types and find correlation between metal enrichment and figure of merit. A simple graphical approach is suggested to determine if the required optical and transport properties can be achieved by varying the thickness of the nanotube layer or a more aggressive treatment is needed. The procedure can be extended to oxide coatings as well.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.