Paper detail

A gapless micro-dielectric-barrier-discharge ion source for analytical applications

Use of dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) as an ion source for sensitive chemical analysis is uncommon because barrier discharges generate excess noise due to spatial and temporal instability. This design uses contacted, crossed glass-coated micro-wires to focus the field into a gradually vanishing gap, suppressing spatial and temporal variability, reducing pressure, temperature, and humidity effects, stabilizing discharge initiation and limiting chemical fragmentation. Positive-ion-mode proton transfer, chemical fragmentation from a micro-discharge, and NO+ adducts combine to allow broad chemical sensitivity. We analyze noise properties of the ion source and report chemical responsivity for a wide range of volatile organic compounds. Source noise spectral density is compared for three systems: the contacted coated wires source, a gapped dielectric barrier discharge source, and a 5 mCi Ni-63 radioactive source. The crossed-wires source shows noise properties approaching those of the white-noise Ni-63 source, while gapped discharge exhibits 1/f noise from area-discharge random path and intensity variations. For chemical sensitivity testing, dilute samples are delivered by vapor flow injection or by gas chromatography, and then detected by differential ion mobility spectrometry (DMS / FAIMS) and, in a few cases by mass spectrometry. The compounds tested in positive ion mode include ketones and alcohols, simple aromatics (benzene, toluene, xylenes, ethyl and propyl benzene), chlorinated and nitrated solvents and aliphatics (hexanes and n-octane), with sensitivities from ppt to ppb levels. The wires source for trace vapor detection is stable under a range of environmental conditions from very low (ppb) humidity levels upward, has wider chemical coverage than the radioactive nickel source with nearly equivalent noise properties, and is adjustable to higher intensity.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.