Paper detail

A Further Look at the Bayes Blind Spot

Gyenis and Redei have demonstrated that any prior p on a finite algebra, however chosen, severely restricts the set of posteriors accessible from p by Jeffrey conditioning on a nontrivial partition. Their demonstration involves showing that the set of posteriors not accessible from p in this way (which they call the Bayes blind spot of p) is large with respect to three common measures of size, namely, having cardinality c, (normalized) Lebesgue measure 1, and Baire second category with respect to a natural topology. In the present paper, we establish analogous results for probability measures defined on any infinite sigma algebra of subsets of a denumerably infinite set. However, we have needed to employ distinctly different approaches to determine the cardinality, and especially, the topological and measure-theoretic sizes of the Bayes blind spot in the infinite case. Interestingly, all of the results that we establish for a single prior p continue to hold for the intersection of the Bayes blind spots of countably many priors. This leads us to conjecture that Bayesian learning itself might be just as culpable as the limitations imposed by priors in enabling the existence of large Bayes blind spots.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.