Paper detail

A Further (Itakura-Saito/beta=0) Bi-stochaticization and Associated Clustering/Regionalization of the 3,107-County 1995-2000 U. S. Migration Network

We extend to the beta-divergence (Itakura-Saito) case beta =0, the comparative bi-stochaticization analyses-previously conducted (arXiv:1208.3428) for the (Kullback-Leibler) beta=1 and (squared-Euclidean) beta = 2 cases -of the 3,107 - county 1995-2000 U. S. migration network. A heuristic, "greedy" algorithm is devised. While the largest 25,329 entries of the 735,531 non-zero entries of the bi-stochasticized table - in the beta=1 case - are required to complete the widely-applied two-stage (double-standardization and strong-component hierarchical clustering) procedure, 105,363 of the 735,531 are needed (reflective of greater uniformity of entries) in the beta=0 instance. The North Carolina counties of Mecklenburg (Charlotte) and Wake (Raleigh) are considerably relatively more cosmopolitan in the beta=0 study. The Colorado county of El Paso (Colorado Springs) replaces the Florida Atlantic county of Brevard (the "Space Coast") as the most cosmopolitan, with Brevard becoming the second-most. Honolulu County splinters away from the other four (still-grouped) Hawaiian counties, becoming the fifth most cosmopolitan county nation-wide. The five counties of Rhode Island remain intact as a regional entity, but the eight counties of Connecticut fragment, leaving only five counties clustered.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.