Paper detail

A fully Lagrangian, non-parametric bias model for dark-matter halos

We present a non-parametric Lagrangian biasing model and fit the ratio of the halo and mass densities at the field level using the mass-weighted halo field in the AbacusSummit simulations at $z=0.5$. Unlike the perturbative halo bias model widely used in interpreting the observed large-scale structure traced by galaxies, we find a non-negative halo-to-mass ratio that increases monotonically with the linear overdensity $δ_1$ in the initial Lagrangian space. The bias expansion, however, does not guarantee non-negativity of the halo counts, and may give rising halo number counts at negative overdensities. The shape of the halo-to-mass ratio is unlikely to be described by a polynomial of $δ_1$ and other quantities. Especially for massive halos with $6\times10^{12}\ h^{-1}\ M_\odot$, the halo-to-mass ratio starts soaring up at $δ_1>0$, substantially different from the predictions of the bias expansion. We show that for the halo masses we consider ($M>3\times10^{11}\ h^{-1}\ M_\odot$) a non-parametric halo-to-mass ratio as a function of $δ_1$ and its local derivative $\nabla^2δ_1$ can recover the halo power spectra to sub-percent level for wavenumbers $k=0.01-0.1\ h\ {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ given a proper smoothing scale to filter the initial density field, even though we do not fit the power spectrum directly. However, there is mild dependence of the recovery of the halo power spectrum on the smoothing scale and other input parameters. At $k<0.01\ h\ {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ and for massive halos with $M>6\times10^{12}\ h^{-1}\ M_\odot$, our non-parametric model leads to a few percent overestimation of the halo power spectrum, indicating the need for larger or multiple smoothing scales. The halo-to-mass ratios obtained qualitatively agree with intuitions from extended Press-Schechter theory. We compare our framework to the bias expansion and discuss possible extensions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.