Researcher profile

Daniel Eisenstein

Daniel Eisenstein contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A fully Lagrangian, non-parametric bias model for dark-matter halos

We present a non-parametric Lagrangian biasing model and fit the ratio of the halo and mass densities at the field level using the mass-weighted halo field in the AbacusSummit simulations at $z=0.5$. Unlike the perturbative halo bias model widely used in interpreting the observed large-scale structure traced by galaxies, we find a non-negative halo-to-mass ratio that increases monotonically with the linear overdensity $δ_1$ in the initial Lagrangian space. The bias expansion, however, does not guarantee non-negativity of the halo counts, and may give rising halo number counts at negative overdensities. The shape of the halo-to-mass ratio is unlikely to be described by a polynomial of $δ_1$ and other quantities. Especially for massive halos with $6\times10^{12}\ h^{-1}\ M_\odot$, the halo-to-mass ratio starts soaring up at $δ_1>0$, substantially different from the predictions of the bias expansion. We show that for the halo masses we consider ($M>3\times10^{11}\ h^{-1}\ M_\odot$) a non-parametric halo-to-mass ratio as a function of $δ_1$ and its local derivative $\nabla^2δ_1$ can recover the halo power spectra to sub-percent level for wavenumbers $k=0.01-0.1\ h\ {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ given a proper smoothing scale to filter the initial density field, even though we do not fit the power spectrum directly. However, there is mild dependence of the recovery of the halo power spectrum on the smoothing scale and other input parameters. At $k<0.01\ h\ {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ and for massive halos with $M>6\times10^{12}\ h^{-1}\ M_\odot$, our non-parametric model leads to a few percent overestimation of the halo power spectrum, indicating the need for larger or multiple smoothing scales. The halo-to-mass ratios obtained qualitatively agree with intuitions from extended Press-Schechter theory. We compare our framework to the bias expansion and discuss possible extensions.

preprint2022arXiv

Accuracy of power spectra in dissipationless cosmological simulations

We exploit a suite of large \emph{N}-body simulations (up to N=$4096^3$) performed with \Abacus, of scale-free models with a range of spectral indices $n$, to better understand and quantify convergence of the matter power spectrum. Using self-similarity to identify converged regions, we show that the maximal wavenumber resolved at a given level of accuracy increases monotonically as a function of time. At the 1\% level it starts at early times from a fraction of $k_Λ$, the Nyquist wavenumber of the initial grid, and reaches at most, if the force softening is sufficiently small, $\sim 2-3 k_Λ$ at the very latest times we evolve to. At the $5\%$ level, accuracy extends up to wavenumbers of order $5k_Λ$ at late times. Expressed as a suitable function of the scale-factor, accuracy shows a very simple $n$-dependence, allowing a extrapolation to place conservative bounds on the accuracy of \emph{N}-body simulations of non-scale free models like LCDM. We note that deviations due to discretization in the converged range are not well modelled by shot noise, and subtracting it in fact degrades accuracy. Quantitatively our findings are broadly in line with the conservative assumptions about resolution adopted by recent studies using large cosmological simulations (e.g. Euclid Flagship) aiming to constrain the mildly non-linear regime. On the other hand, we remark that conclusions about small scale clustering (e.g. concerning the validity of stable clustering) obtained using PS data at wavenumbers larger than a few $k_Λ$ may need revision in light of our convergence analysis.

preprint2021arXiv

Quantifying resolution in cosmological N-body simulations using self-similarity

We demonstrate that testing for self-similarity in scale-free simulations provides an excellent tool to quantify the resolution at small scales of cosmological N-body simulations. Analysing two-point correlation functions measured in simulations using ABACUS, we show how observed deviations from self-similarity reveal the range of time and distance scales in which convergence is obtained. While the well-converged scales show accuracy below 1 percent, our results show that, with a small force softening length, the spatial resolution is essentially determined by the mass resolution. At later times the lower cut-off scale on convergence evolves in comoving units as $a^{-1/2}$ ($a$ being the scale factor), consistent with a hypothesis that it is set by two-body collisionality. A corollary of our results is that N-body simulations, particularly at high red-shift, contain a significant spatial range in which clustering appears converged with respect to the time-stepping and force softening but has not actually converged to the physical continuum result. The method developed can be applied to determine the resolution of any clustering statistic and extended to infer resolution limits for non-scale-free simulations.

preprint2021arXiv

The DESI $N$-body Simulation Project I: Testing the Robustness of Simulations for the DESI Dark Time Survey

Analysis of large galaxy surveys requires confidence in the robustness of numerical simulation methods. The simulations are used to construct mock galaxy catalogs to validate data analysis pipelines and identify potential systematics. We compare three $N$-body simulation codes, ABACUS, GADGET, and SWIFT, to investigate the regimes in which their results agree. We run $N$-body simulations at three different mass resolutions, $6.25\times10^{8}$, $2.11\times10^{9}$, and $5.00\times10^{9}~h^{-1}$M$_{\odot}$, matching phases to reduce the noise within the comparisons. We find systematic errors in the halo clustering between different codes are smaller than the DESI statistical error for $s > 20\, h^{-1}$Mpc in the correlation function in redshift space. Through the resolution comparison we find that simulations run with a mass resolution of $2.1\times10^{9}~h^{-1}$M$_{\odot}$ are sufficiently converged for systematic effects in the halo clustering to be smaller than the DESI statistical error at scales larger than $20 \, h^{-1}$Mpc. These findings show that the simulations are robust for extracting cosmological information from large scales which is the key goal of the DESI survey. Comparing matter power spectra, we find the codes agree to within 1% for $k \leq 10~h$Mpc$^{-1}$. We also run a comparison of three initial condition generation codes and find good agreement. In addition, we include a quasi-$N$-body code, FastPM, since we plan use it for certain DESI analyses. The impact of the halo definition and galaxy-halo relation will be presented in a follow up study.

preprint2020arXiv

Limitations to the &#34;basic&#39;&#39; HOD model and beyond

We make use of the IllustrisTNG cosmological, hydrodynamical simulations to test fundamental assumptions of the mass-based Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) approach to modelling the galaxy-halo connection. By comparing the clustering of galaxies measured in the 300 Mpc TNG box (TNG300) with that predicted by the standard (``basic&#39;&#39;) HOD model, we find that, on average, the ``basic&#39;&#39; HOD model underpredicts the real-space correlation function in the TNG300 box by $\sim$ 15\% on scales of $1 \ {\rm Mpc}/h < r < 20 \ {\rm Mpc}/h$, which is well beyond the target precision demanded of next-generation galaxy redshift surveys. We perform several tests to establish the robustness of our findings to systematic effects, including the effect of finite box size and the choice of halo finder. In our exploration of ``secondary&#39;&#39; parameters with which to augment the ``basic&#39;&#39; HOD, we find that the local environment of the halo, the velocity dispersion anisotropy, $β$, and the product of the half-mass radius and the velocity dispersion, $σ^2 R_{\rm halfmass}$, are the three most effective measures of assembly bias that help reconcile the ``basic&#39;&#39; HOD-predicted clustering with that in TNG300. In addition, we test other halo properties such as halo spin, formation epoch and halo concentration. We also find that at fixed halo mass, galaxies in one type of environment cluster differently from galaxies in another. We demonstrate that a more complete model of the galaxy-halo connection can be constructed if we combine both mass and local environment information about the halo.

preprint2020arXiv

On the accuracy of common moment-based radiative transfer methods for simulating reionization

Cosmological simulations of reionization often treat radiative transfer by solving for the monopole and dipoles of the intensity field and by making ansatz for the quadrupole moments to close the system of equations. We investigate the accuracy of the most common closure methods, i.e. Eddington tensor choices. We argue that these algorithms are most likely to err after reionization and study quasi-analytic test problems mimicking these situations: large-scale post-reionization ionizing background fluctuations and radiative transfer in a predominantly ionized medium with discrete absorbers. We show that OTVET and M1 over-ionize self-shielding absorbers when fixing the background photoionization rate, leading to 30-40% higher emissivity to balance the increased recombination. This over-ionization results in a simulation run with these algorithms having a factor of ~2 lower average metagalactic photoionization rate relative to truth given an ionizing emissivity. Furthermore, these algorithms are unlikely to reproduce ionizing background fluctuations on scales below the photon mean path: OTVET tends to overpredict the fluctuations there when the simulation box is smaller than twice the mean free path and underpredict otherwise, while M1 drastically underpredicts these fluctuations. As a result, these numerical methods are likely not sufficiently accurate to interpret the Ly$α$ forest opacity fluctuations observed after reionzation. We show that a high number of angular directions need to be followed to capture the post-reionization ionizing background fluctuations accurately with ray-tracing codes. Lastly, we argue that the strong dependence of the post-reionization ionizing background on the value of the reduced speed of light found in many simulations signals that the ionizing photon mean free path is several times larger in such simulations than the observationally measured value.