Paper detail

A Full Characterization of Irrelevant Components in Diameter Constrained Reliability

In classical network reliability analysis, the system under study is a network with perfect nodes but imperfect link, that fail stochastically and independently. There, the goal is to find the probability that the resulting random graph is connected, called \emph{reliability}. Although the exact reliability computation belongs to the class of $\mathcal{NP}$-Hard problems, the literature offers three exact methods for exact reliability computation, to know, Sum of Disjoint Products (SDPs), Inclusion-Exclusion and Factorization. Inspired in delay-sensitive applications in telecommunications, Héctor Cancela and Louis Petingi defined in 2001 the diameter-constrained reliability, where terminals are required to be connected by $d$ hops or less, being $d$ a positive integer, called diameter. Factorization theory in classical network reliability is a mature area. However, an extension to the diameter-constrained context requires at least the recognition of irrelevant links, and an extension of deletion-contraction formula. In this paper, we fully characterize the determination of irrelevant links. Diameter-constrained reliability invariants are presented, which, together with the recognition of irrelevant links, represent the building-blocks for a new factorization theory. The paper is closed with a discussion of trends for future work.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.