Paper detail

A Framework for Modelling Probabilistic Uncertainty in Rainfall Scenario Analysis

Predicting future probable values of model parameters, is an essential pre-requisite for assessing model decision reliability in an uncertain environment. Scenario Analysis is a methodology for modelling uncertainty in water resources management modelling. Uncertainty if not considered appropriately in decision making will decrease reliability of decisions, especially in long-term planning. One of the challenges in Scenario Analysis is how scenarios are made. One of the most approved methods is statistical modelling based on Auto-Regressive models. Stream flow future scenarios in developed basins that human has made changes to the natural flow process could not be generated directly by ARMA modelling. In this case, making scenarios for monthly rainfall and using it in a water resources system model makes more sense. Rainfall is an ephemeral process which has zero values in some months which introduces some limitations in making use of monthly ARMA model. Therefore, a two stage modelling approach is adopted here which in the first stage yearly modelling is done. Within this yearly model three ranges are identified: Dry, Normal and Wet. In the normal range yearly ARMA modelling is used. Dry and Wet range are considered as random processes and are modeled by frequency analysis. Monthly distribution of rainfall, which is extracted from available data from a moving average are considered to be deterministic and fixed in time. Each rainfall scenario is composed of a yearly ARMA process super-imposed by dry and wet events according to the frequency analysis. This modelling framework is applied to available data from three rain-gauge stations in Iran. Results show this modelling approach has better consistency with observed data in comparison with making use of ARMA modelling alone.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.