Paper detail

A forgotten theorem of Pełczyński: $(λ+)$-injective spaces need not be $λ$-injective -- the case $λ\in (1,2]$

Isbell and Semadeni [Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 107 (1963)] proved that every infinite-dimensional $1$-injective Banach space contains a hyperplane that is $(2+\varepsilon)$-injective for every $\varepsilon > 0$, yet is is \emph{not} $2$-injective and remarked in a footnote that Pełczyński had proved for every $λ> 1$ the existence of a $(λ+ \varepsilon)$-injective space ($\varepsilon > 0$) that is not $λ$-injective. Unfortunately, no trace of the proof of Pełczyński's result has been preserved. In the present paper, we establish the said theorem for $λ\in (1,2]$ by constructing an appropriate renorming of $\ell_\infty$. This contrasts (at least for real scalars) with the case $λ= 1$ for which Lindenstrauss [Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (1964)] proved the contrary statement.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.