Paper detail

A Family of Denominator Bounds for First Order Linear Recurrence Systems

For linear recurrence systems, the problem of finding rational solutions is reduced to the problem of computing polynomial solutions by computing a content bound or a denominator bound. There are several bounds in the literature. The sharpest bound leads to polynomial solutions of lower degrees, but this advantage need not compensate for the time spent on computing that bound. To strike the best balance between sharpness of the bound versus CPU time spent obtaining it, we will give a family of bounds. The $J$'th member of this family is similar to (Abramov, Barkatou, 1998) when $J=1$, similar to (van Hoeij, 1998) when $J$ is large, and novel for intermediate values of $J$, which give the best balance between sharpness and CPU time. The setting for our content bounds are systems $τ(Y) = MY$ where $τ$ is an automorphism of a UFD, and $M$ is an invertible matrix with entries in its field of fractions. This setting includes the shift case, the $q$-shift case, the multi-basic case and others. We give two versions, a global version, and a version that bounds each entry separately.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.