Source author record

Johannes Middeke

Johannes Middeke appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Family of Denominator Bounds for First Order Linear Recurrence Systems

For linear recurrence systems, the problem of finding rational solutions is reduced to the problem of computing polynomial solutions by computing a content bound or a denominator bound. There are several bounds in the literature. The sharpest bound leads to polynomial solutions of lower degrees, but this advantage need not compensate for the time spent on computing that bound. To strike the best balance between sharpness of the bound versus CPU time spent obtaining it, we will give a family of bounds. The $J$'th member of this family is similar to (Abramov, Barkatou, 1998) when $J=1$, similar to (van Hoeij, 1998) when $J$ is large, and novel for intermediate values of $J$, which give the best balance between sharpness and CPU time. The setting for our content bounds are systems $τ(Y) = MY$ where $τ$ is an automorphism of a UFD, and $M$ is an invertible matrix with entries in its field of fractions. This setting includes the shift case, the $q$-shift case, the multi-basic case and others. We give two versions, a global version, and a version that bounds each entry separately.

preprint2016arXiv

Matrix factoring by fraction-free reduction

We consider exact matrix decomposition by Gauss-Bareiss reduction. We investigate two aspects of the process: common row and column factors and the influence of pivoting strategies. We identify two types of common factors: systematic and statistical. Systematic factors depend on the process, while statistical factors depend on the specific data. We show that existing fraction-free QR (Gram-Schmidt) algorithms create a common factor in the last column of Q. We relate the existence of row factors in LU decomposition to factors appearing in the Smith normal form of the matrix. For statistical factors, we identify mechanisms and give estimates of the frequency. Our conclusions are tested by experimental data. For pivoting strategies, we compare the sizes of output factors obtained by different strategies. We also comment on timing differences.