Paper detail

A Discrepancy Bound for a Deterministic Acceptance-Rejection Sampler

We consider an acceptance-rejection sampler based on a deterministic driver sequence. The deterministic sequence is chosen such that the discrepancy between the empirical target distribution and the target distribution is small. We use quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) point sets for this purpose. The empirical evidence shows convergence rates beyond the crude Monte Carlo rate of $N^{-1/2}$. We prove that the discrepancy of samples generated by the QMC acceptance-rejection sampler is bounded from above by $N^{-1/s}$. A lower bound shows that for any given driver sequence, there always exists a target density such that the star discrepancy is at most $N^{-2/(s+1)}$. For a general density, whose domain is the real state space $\mathbb{R}^{s-1}$, the inverse Rosenblatt transformation can be used to convert samples from the $(s-1)-$dimensional cube to $\mathbb{R}^{s-1}$. We show that this transformation is measure preserving. This way, under certain conditions, we obtain the same convergence rate for a general target density defined in $\mathbb{R}^{s-1}$. Moreover, we also consider a deterministic reduced acceptance-rejection algorithm recently introduced by Barekat and Caflisch [F. Barekat and R.Caflisch. Simulation with Fluctuation and Singular Rates. ArXiv:1310.4555[math.NA], 2013.]

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.