Paper detail

A Deterministic Algorithm for the MST Problem in Constant Rounds of Congested Clique

In this paper, we show that the Minimum Spanning Tree problem can be solved \emph{deterministically}, in $\mathcal{O}(1)$ rounds of the $\mathsf{Congested}$ $\mathsf{Clique}$ model. In the $\mathsf{Congested}$ $\mathsf{Clique}$ model, there are $n$ players that perform computation in synchronous rounds. Each round consist of a phase of local computation and a phase of communication, in which each pair of players is allowed to exchange $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ bit messages. The studies of this model began with the MST problem: in the paper by Lotker et al.[SPAA'03, SICOMP'05] that defines the $\mathsf{Congested}$ $\mathsf{Clique}$ model the authors give a deterministic $\mathcal{O}(\log \log n)$ round algorithm that improved over a trivial $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ round adaptation of Borůvka's algorithm. There was a sequence of gradual improvements to this result: an $\mathcal{O}(\log \log \log n)$ round algorithm by Hegeman et al. [PODC'15], an $\mathcal{O}(\log^* n)$ round algorithm by Ghaffari and Parter, [PODC'16] and an $\mathcal{O}(1)$ round algorithm by Jurdziński and Nowicki, [SODA'18], but all those algorithms were randomized, which left the question about the existence of any deterministic $o(\log \log n)$ round algorithms for the Minimum Spanning Tree problem open. Our result resolves this question and establishes that $\mathcal{O}(1)$ rounds is enough to solve the MST problem in the $\mathsf{Congested}$ $\mathsf{Clique}$ model, even if we are not allowed to use any randomness. Furthermore, the amount of communication needed by the algorithm makes it applicable to some variants of the $\mathsf{MPC}$ model.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.