Paper detail

A deep dive into the $2g+h$ resonance: separatrices, manifolds and phase space structure of navigation satellites

Despite extended past studies, several questions regarding the resonant structure of the medium-Earth orbit (MEO) region remain hitherto unanswered. This work describes in depth the effects of the $2g+h$ lunisolar resonance. In particular, (i) we compute the correct forms of the separatrices of the resonance in the inclination-eccentricity space for fixed semi-major axis. This allows to compute the change in the width of the $2g+h$ resonance as the altitude increases. (ii) We discuss the crucial role played by the value of the inclination of the Laplace plane, $i_{L}$. Since $i_L$ is comparable to the resonance's separatrix width, the parametrization of all resonance bifurcations has to be done in terms of the proper inclination $i_{p}$, instead of the mean one. (iii) The subset of circular orbits constitutes an invariant subspace embedded in the full phase space, the center manifold $\mathcal{C}$. Using $i_p$ as a label, we compute its range of values for which $\mathcal{C}$ becomes a normally hyperbolic invariant manifold (NHIM). The structure of invariant tori in $\mathcal{C}$ allows to explain the role of the initial phase $h$ noticed in several works. (iv) Through Fast Lyapunov Indicator (FLI) cartography, we portray the stable and unstable manifolds of the NHIM as the altitude increases. Manifold oscillations dominate in phase space between $a=24,000$ km and $a=30,000$ km as a result of the sweeping of the $2g+h$ resonance by the $h-Ω_{\rm{Moon}}$ and $2h-Ω_{\rm{Moon}}$ resonances. The noticeable effects of the latter are explained as a consequence of the relative inclination of the Moon's orbit with respect to the ecliptic. The role of the phases $(h,Ω_{\rm{Moon}})$ in the structures observed in the FLI maps is also clarified. Finally,(v) we discuss how the understanding of the manifold dynamics could inspire end-of-life disposal strategies.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.