Paper detail

A Deep Bayesian Neural Network for Cardiac Arrhythmia Classification with Rejection from ECG Recordings

With the development of deep learning-based methods, automated classification of electrocardiograms (ECGs) has recently gained much attention. Although the effectiveness of deep neural networks has been encouraging, the lack of information given by the outputs restricts clinicians' reexamination. If the uncertainty estimation comes along with the classification results, cardiologists can pay more attention to "uncertain" cases. Our study aims to classify ECGs with rejection based on data uncertainty and model uncertainty. We perform experiments on a real-world 12-lead ECG dataset. First, we estimate uncertainties using the Monte Carlo dropout for each classification prediction, based on our Bayesian neural network. Then, we accept predictions with uncertainty under a given threshold and provide "uncertain" cases for clinicians. Furthermore, we perform a simulation experiment using varying thresholds. Finally, with the help of a clinician, we conduct case studies to explain the results of large uncertainties and incorrect predictions with small uncertainties. The results show that correct predictions are more likely to have smaller uncertainties, and the performance on accepted predictions improves as the accepting ratio decreases (i.e. more rejections). Case studies also help explain why rejection can improve the performance. Our study helps neural networks produce more accurate results and provide information on uncertainties to better assist clinicians in the diagnosis process. It can also enable deep-learning-based ECG interpretation in clinical implementation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.