Paper detail

A decision-tree framework to select optimal box-sizes for product shipments

In package-handling facilities, boxes of varying sizes are used to ship products. Improperly sized boxes with box dimensions much larger than the product dimensions create wastage and unduly increase the shipping costs. Since it is infeasible to make unique, tailor-made boxes for each of the $N$ products, the fundamental question that confronts e-commerce companies is: How many $K << N$ cuboidal boxes need to manufactured and what should be their dimensions? In this paper, we propose a solution for the single-count shipment containing one product per box in two steps: (i) reduce it to a clustering problem in the $3$ dimensional space of length, width and height where each cluster corresponds to the group of products that will be shipped in a particular size variant, and (ii) present an efficient forward-backward decision tree based clustering method with low computational complexity on $N$ and $K$ to obtain these $K$ clusters and corresponding box dimensions. Our algorithm has multiple constituent parts, each specifically designed to achieve a high-quality clustering solution. As our method generates clusters in an incremental fashion without discarding the present solution, adding or deleting a size variant is as simple as stopping the backward pass early or executing it for one more iteration. We tested the efficacy of our approach by simulating actual single-count shipments that were transported during a month by Amazon using the proposed box dimensions. Even by just modifying the existing box dimensions and not adding a new size variant, we achieved a reduction of $4.4\%$ in the shipment volume, contributing to the decrease in non-utilized, air volume space by $2.2\%$. The reduction in shipment volume and air volume improved significantly to $10.3\%$ and $6.1\%$ when we introduced $4$ additional boxes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.