Paper detail

A contractor-renormalization study of Hubbard plaquette clusters

We implement the contractor-renormalization method to study the checkerboard Hubbard model on various finite-size clusters as function of the inter-plaquette hopping t' and the on-site repulsion U at low hole doping. We find that the pair-binding energy and the spin gap exhibit a pronounced maximum at intermediate values of t' and U, thus indicating that moderate inhomogeneity of the type considered here substantially enhances the formation of hole pairs. The rise of the pair-binding energy for t'<t'_max is kinetic-energy driven and reflects the strong resonating valence bond correlations in the ground state that facilitate the motion of bound pairs as compared to single holes. Conversely, as t' is increased beyond t'_max antiferromagnetic magnons proliferate and reduce the potential energy of unpaired holes and with it the pairing strength. For the periodic clusters that we study the estimated phase ordering temperature at t'=t'_max is a factor of 2-7 smaller than the pairing temperature.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.