Paper detail

A Computational Model for Logical Analysis of Data

Initially introduced by Peter Hammer, Logical Analysis of Data is a methodology that aims at computing a logical justification for dividing a group of data in two groups of observations, usually called the positive and negative groups. Consider this partition into positive and negative groups as the description of a partially defined Boolean function; the data is then processed to identify a subset of attributes, whose values may be used to characterize the observations of the positive groups against those of the negative group. LAD constitutes an interesting rule-based learning alternative to classic statistical learning techniques and has many practical applications. Nevertheless, the computation of group characterization may be costly, depending on the properties of the data instances. A major aim of our work is to provide effective tools for speeding up the computations, by computing some \emph{a priori} probability that a given set of attributes does characterize the positive and negative groups. To this effect, we propose several models for representing the data set of observations, according to the information we have on it. These models, and the probabilities they allow us to compute, are also helpful for quickly assessing some properties of the real data at hand; furthermore they may help us to better analyze and understand the computational difficulties encountered by solving methods. Once our models have been established, the mathematical tools for computing probabilities come from Analytic Combinatorics. They allow us to express the desired probabilities as ratios of generating functions coefficients, which then provide a quick computation of their numerical values. A further, long-range goal of this paper is to show that the methods of Analytic Combinatorics can help in analyzing the performance of various algorithms in LAD and related fields.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.