Paper detail

A computational approach to the Thompson group $F$

Let $F$ denote the Thompson group with standard generators $A=x_0$, $B=x_1$. It is a long standing open problem whether $F$ is an amenable group. By a result of Kesten from 1959, amenability of $F$ is equivalent to $$(i)\qquad ||I+A+B||=3$$ and to $$(ii)\qquad ||A+A^{-1}+B+B^{-1}||=4,$$ where in both cases the norm of an element in the group ring $\mathbb{C} F$ is computed in $B(\ell^2(F))$ via the regular representation of $F$. By extensive numerical computations, we obtain precise lower bounds for the norms in $(i)$ and $(ii)$, as well as good estimates of the spectral distributions of $(I+A+B)^*(I+A+B)$ and of $A+A^{-1}+B+B^{-1}$ with respect to the tracial state $τ$ on the group von Neumann Algebra $L(F)$. Our computational results suggest, that $$||I+A+B||\approx 2.95 \qquad ||A+A^{-1}+B+B^{-1}||\approx 3.87.$$ It is however hard to obtain precise upper bounds for the norms, and our methods cannot be used to prove non-amenability of $F$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.