Paper detail

A comprehensive classification of complex statistical systems and an ab-initio derivation of their entropy and distribution functions

To characterize strongly interacting statistical systems within a thermodynamical framework - complex systems in particular - it might be necessary to introduce generalized entropies, $S_g$. A series of such entropies have been proposed in the past, mainly to accommodate important empirical distribution functions to a maximum ignorance principle. Until now the understanding of the fundamental origin of these entropies and its deeper relations to complex systems is limited. Here we explore this questions from first principles. We start by observing that the 4th Khinchin axiom (separability axiom) is violated by strongly interacting systems in general and ask about the consequences of violating the 4th axiom while assuming the first three Khinchin axioms (K1-K3) to hold and $S_g=\sum_ig(p_i)$. We prove by simple scaling arguments that under these requirements {\em each} statistical system is uniquely characterized by a distinct pair of scaling exponents $(c,d)$ in the large size limit. The exponents define equivalence classes for all interacting and non interacting systems. This allows to derive a unique entropy, $S_{c,d}\propto \sum_i Γ(d+1, 1- c \ln p_i)$, which covers all entropies which respect K1-K3 and can be written as $S_g=\sum_ig(p_i)$. Known entropies can now be classified within these equivalence classes. The corresponding distribution functions are special forms of Lambert-$W$ exponentials containing as special cases Boltzmann, stretched exponential and Tsallis distributions (power-laws) -- all widely abundant in nature. This is, to our knowledge, the first {\em ab initio} justification for the existence of generalized entropies. Even though here we assume $S_g=\sum_ig(p_i)$, we show that more general entropic forms can be classified along the same lines.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.