Paper detail

A comparison of the carrier density at the surface of quantum wells for different crystal orientations of silicon, gallium arsenide and indium arsenide

We report the carrier densities at the surface of single-crystal quantum wells as a function of material, orientation and well width. We include wells constructed from silicon, gallium arsenide and indium arsenide with three crystal orientations, (100), (110) and (111), included for each material. We find that the D2 states in a silicon (100) quantum well have the smallest density near the surface of the slab. Inspection of the planar average of the carrier densities reveals a characteristic shape that depends on the material and orientation, which leads to a varying degree of suppression or enhancement of the density near the surface. The physics responsible for the suppression or enhancement of the density near the surface can be traced to a constraint imposed by the symmetry of quantum well wavefunction on the phases of the bulk Bloch states of the crystal from which it can be constructed.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.