Paper detail

A comparison of some criteria for states selection in the latent Markov model for longitudinal data

We compare different selection criteria to choose the number of latent states of a multivariate latent Markov model for longitudinal data. This model is based on an underlying Markov chain to represent the evolution of a latent characteristic of a group of individuals over time. Then, the response variables observed at the different occasions are assumed to be conditionally independent given this chain. Maximum likelihood of the model is carried out through an Expectation-Maximization algorithm based on forward-backward recursions which are well known in the hidden Markov literature for time series. The selection criteria we consider in our comparison are based on penalized versions of the maximum log-likelihood or on the posterior probabilities of belonging to each latent state, that is the conditional probability of the latent state given the observed data. A Monte Carlo simulation study shows that the indices referred to the log-likelihood based information criteria perform in general better with respect to those referred to the classification based criteria. This is due to the fact that the latter tend to underestimate the true number of latent states, especially in the univariate case.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.