Paper detail

A comparison between two evaluations of neutron multiplicity distributions

Within MCNP6, users can use multiplicity distributions for spontaneous and neutron-induced fission from an evaluation performed by Lestone (LA-UR-05-0288). This evaluation assumes the multiplicity distributions are Gaussian and adjusts the standard deviations to reproduce measured 2nd and 3rd factorial moments. In MCNPX, users have the option of using multiplicity distributions for spontaneous fission using an evaluation of the available experimental data by Santi and Miller (LA-UR-07-6229). The spontaneous fission multiplicity distributions and corresponding factorial moments from these two evaluations are compared in the present paper. The differences are minor or within experimental errors for all but the spontaneous fission of 238Pu. The 238Pu evaluations are based on data obtained in 1956. We recommend that the 238Pu multiplicity distribution be re-measured. Given the good agreement between the two evaluations, the choice of evaluation will make little difference for the modeling of spontaneous fission. However, we suggest that the evaluation in LA-UR-05-0288 be adopted as the MCNP default because it also includes recommended distributions for neutron induced fission.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.