Paper detail

A comparative study on $B \rar K^\ast \ell^+ \ell^-$ and $B \rar K_0^\ast (1430) \ell^+ \ell^-$ decays in the Supersymmetric Models

In this paper, we compare the branching ratio and rate difference of electron channel to muon channel of $B \rar K_0^\ast (1430) \ell^+ \ell^-$ and $B \rar K^\ast \ell^+ \ell^-$decays, where $K_0^\ast (1430)$ is the p--wave scalar meson, in the supersymmetric models. MSSM with $R$ parity is considered since considerable deviation from the standard model predictions can be obtained in $B\rightarrow X_s \ell^-\ell^+$. Taking $C_{Q1}$ and $C_{Q2}$ about one which is consistent with the $B\to K^\astμ^+μ^-$ rate at low dileptonic invariant mass region($1\leq q^2\leq 6$GeV$^2$). It is found that, firstly, the $B \rar K_0^\ast (1430) \ell^+ \ell^-$ $(\ell = μ,\, τ)$ decay is measurable at LHC, secondly, in comparison with $B \rar K^\ast \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay a greater deviation in the $B \rar K_0^\ast (1430) \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay can be seen. Measurement of these observables for the semileptonic rare $B \rar K_0^\ast (1430) \ell^+ \ell^-$, in particular, at low $q^2$ region can give valuable information about the nature of interactions within Standard Model or beyond.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.