Paper detail

A Comparative Evaluation of Power Converter Circuits to Increase the Power Transfer Capability of High Voltage Transmission Lines

AC transmission lines with lengths greater than 80km cannot be used to their maximum capacity due to limits in voltage drops and transient stability. This inefficient way of using conductors in a transmission line can be overcome if the electrical frequency at which energy is transmitted is reduced. This is why this work focuses on the comparison of the Modular Multilevel Matrix Converter (MMMC) and the Back-to-Back Modular Multilevel Converter (BTB-MMC), topologies that have shown qualities as frequency converters. For comparison, an analytical model of each topology is used to relate design considerations to their operational variables. Among the aspects to be compared are, the requirements of the semiconductors, the required reactive components, operating losses and fault tolerance. Detailed design equations, EMTP simulations, and comparison table are presented.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.