Paper detail

A combinatorial approach to classical representation theory

A fundamental problem from invariant theory is to describe the endomorphism algebra of multilinear functions on a representation V invariant under the action of a group G. According to Weyl's classic, a first main (later: fundamental) theorem of invariant theory provides a finite spanning set for this algebra, whereas a a second main theorem describes the linear relations between those basic invariants. We use diagrammatic methods to carry Weyl's programme a step further, providing explicit bases for the subspace of the r-th tensor powers of V invariant under the action of G, that are additionally preserved by the action of the long cycle of the symmetric group on r letters. The representations we study are essentially those that occur in Weyl's book: the defining representations of the symplectic groups, the defining representations of the symmetric groups considered as linear representations, and the adjoint representations of the linear groups. In particular, we present a transparent, combinatorial proof of a second fundamental theorem for the defining representation of the symplectic groups Sp(2n). Our formulation is explicit and provides a very precise link to (n+1)-noncrossing perfect matchings, going beyond a dimension count. Extending our argument to the k-th symmetric powers of these representations, the combinatorial objects involved turn out to be (n+1)-noncrossing k-regular graphs. As corollaries we obtain instances of the cyclic sieving phenomenon for these objects and the natural rotation action. In general, we derive branching rules for the diagram algebras corresponding to the representations in a uniform way. We also compute the Frobenius characteristics of modules of the diagram algebras restricted to the action of the symmetric group and obtain the isotypic decomposition of the r-th tensor power of V when n is large enough in comparison to r.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.