Paper detail

A Coincidence Problem: How to Flow from N=2 SQCD to N=1 SQCD

We discuss, and propose a solution for, a still unresolved problem regarding the breaking from $\N=2$ super-QCD to $\N=1$ super-QCD. A mass term $W=μ\Tr Φ^2 / 2$ for the adjoint field, which classically does the required breaking perfectly, quantum mechanically leads to a relevant operator that, in the infrared, makes the theory flow away from pure $\N=1$ SQCD. To avoid this problem, we first need to extend the theory from $\SU (n_c)$ to $\U (n_c)$. We then look for the quantum generalization of the condition $W^{\prime}(m)=0$, that is, the coincidence between a root of the derivative of the superpotential $W(ϕ)$ and the mass $m$ of the quarks. There are $2n_c -n_f$ of such points in the moduli space. We suggest that with an opportune choice of superpotential, that selects one of these coincidence vacua in the moduli space, it is possible to flow from $\N=2$ SQCD to $\N=1$ SQCD. Various arguments support this claim. In particular, we shall determine the exact location in the moduli space of these coincidence vacua and the precise factorization of the SW curve.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.