Paper detail

A blueprinted view on $\mathbb F_1$-geometry

This overview paper has two parts. In the first part, we review the development of $\mathbb F_1$-geometry from the first mentioning by Jacques Tits in 1956 until the present day. We explain the main ideas around $\mathbb F_1$, embedded into the historical context, and give an impression of the multiple connections of $\mathbb F_1$-geometry to other areas of mathematics. In the second part, we review (and preview) the geometry of blueprints. Beyond the basic definitions of blueprints, blue schemes and projective geometry, this includes a theory of Chevalley groups over $\mathbb F_1$ together with their action on buildings over $\mathbb F_1$; computations of the Euler characteristic in terms of $\mathbb F_1$-rational points, which involve quiver Grassmannians; $K$-theory of blue schemes that reproduces the formula $K_i(\mathbb F_1)=π^{st}_i(S^0)$; models of the compactifications of $\Spec \mathbb Z$ and other arithmetic curves; and explanations about the connections to other approaches towards $\mathbb F_1$ like monoidal schemes after Deitmar, $B_1$-algebras after Lescot, $Λ$-schemes after Borger, relative schemes after Toën and Vaquié, log schemes after Kato and congruence schemes after Berkovich and Deitmar.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.