Paper detail

A Bi-level assessment of Twitter in predicting the results of an election: Delhi Assembly Elections 2020

Elections are the backbone of any democratic country, where voters elect the candidates as their representatives. The emergence of social networking sites has provided a platform for political parties and their candidates to connect with voters in order to spread their political ideas. Our study aims to use Twitter in assessing the outcome of Delhi Assembly elections held in 2020, using a bi-level approach, i.e., concerning political parties and their candidates. We analyze the correlation of election results with the activities of different candidates and parties on Twitter, and the response of voters on them, especially the mentions and sentiment of voters towards a party. The Twitter profiles of the candidates are compared both at the party level as well as the candidate level to evaluate their association with the outcome of the election. We observe that the number of followers and the replies to the tweets of candidates are good indicators for predicting actual election outcome. However, we observe that the number of tweets mentioning a party and the sentiment of voters towards the party shown in tweets are not aligned with the election result. We also use machine learning models on various features such as linguistic, word embeddings and moral dimensions for predicting the election result (win or lose). The random forest model using tweet features provides promising results for predicting if the tweet belongs to a winning or losing candidate.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.