Paper detail

A Bayesian model for microarray datasets merging

The aggregation of microarray datasets originating from different studies is still a difficult open problem. Currently, best results are generally obtained by the so-called meta-analysis approach, which aggregates results from individual datasets, instead of analyzing aggre-gated datasets. In order to tackle such aggregation problems, it is necessary to correct for interstudy variability prior to aggregation. The goal of this paper is to present a new approach for microarray datasets merging, based upon explicit modeling of interstudy variability and gene variability. We develop and demonstrate a new algorithm for microarray datasets merging. The underlying model assumes normally distributed intrinsic gene expressions, distorted by a study-dependent nonlinear transformation, and study dependent (normally distributed) observation noise. The algorithm addresses both parameter estimation (the parameters being gene expression means and variances, observation noise variances and the nonlinear transformations) and data adjustment, and yields as a result adjusted datasets suitable for aggregation. The method is validated on two case studies. The first one concerns E. Coli expression data, artificially distorted by given nonlinear transformations and additive observation noise. The proposed method is able to correct for the distortion, and yields adjusted datasets from which the relevant biological effects can be recovered, as shown by a standard differential analysis. The second case study concerns the aggregation of two real prostate cancer datasets. After adjustment using the proposed algorithm, a differential analysis performed on adjusted datasets yields a larger number of differentially expressed genes (between control and tumor data). The proposed method has been implemented using the statistical software R 1, and Bioconductor packages 2. The source code (valid for merging two datasets), as well as the datasets used for the validation, and some complementary results, are made available on the web site

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.