Paper detail

A Bayesian model averaging approach for observational gene expression studies

Identifying differentially expressed (DE) genes associated with a sample characteristic is the primary objective of many microarray studies. As more and more studies are carried out with observational rather than well controlled experimental samples, it becomes important to evaluate and properly control the impact of sample heterogeneity on DE gene finding. Typical methods for identifying DE genes require ranking all the genes according to a preselected statistic based on a single model for two or more group comparisons, with or without adjustment for other covariates. Such single model approaches unavoidably result in model misspecification, which can lead to increased error due to bias for some genes and reduced efficiency for the others. We evaluated the impact of model misspecification from such approaches on detecting DE genes and identified parameters that affect the magnitude of impact. To properly control for sample heterogeneity and to provide a flexible and coherent framework for identifying simultaneously DE genes associated with a single or multiple sample characteristics and/or their interactions, we proposed a Bayesian model averaging approach which corrects the model misspecification by averaging over model space formed by all relevant covariates. An empirical approach is suggested for specifying prior model probabilities. We demonstrated through simulated microarray data that this approach resulted in improved performance in DE gene identification compared to the single model approaches. The flexibility of this approach is demonstrated through our analysis of data from two observational microarray studies.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.