Paper detail

A Bayesian mixture model captures temporal and spatial structure of voting blocs within longitudinal referendum data

The estimation of voting blocs is an important statistical inquiry in political science. However, the scope of these analyses is usually restricted to roll call data where individual votes are directly observed. Here, we examine a Bayesian mixture model with Dirichlet-multinomial components to infer voting blocs within longitudinal referendum data aggregated at the municipal level. As a case study, we analyze vote totals from 423 municipalities in the US state Maine for 54 referendum questions balloted from 2008-2019. Using this model, we recover the posterior distribution on the number of voting blocs, the support for each question within each bloc, and the blocs' mixture within each municipality. We find that these voting blocs are structured by geography and are largely consistent across the study period. Further analysis of the posterior distribution provides three additional findings: voting blocs exhibit both gradients and discontinuities in their overall structure that are consistent with geography and culture; a small number of questions are inconsistent with the statewide bloc structure and these questions' content relate to specific regions; and that the blocs exhibit evidence of increased polarization across blocs during the study period. We conclude with an outline of statistical extensions of this model, connections to other statistical frameworks in political science (such as polling), and detail candidate locations for subsequent applications of the model.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.